Norton & Co., 1981), in which Gould exposed case after. Kamin of Princeton University has said, "a major contribution toward deflating pseudobiological 'explanations' of our present social woes". Goulds critique, published in Science in 1978 (.pdf) and made famous in The Mismeasure of Man, was that Mortons measurements unconsciously reflected his biases. Holloways slur is based on a critique by him and five other anthropologists of Goulds famous 1981 work The Mismeasure of Man (W. These additions strengthen the claim of this book to be, as Leo J. Gould has written a substantial new introduction telling how and why he wrote the book and tracing the subsequent history of the controversy on innateness right through The Bell Curve, Further, he has added five essays, in a separate section at the end, on questions of The Bell Curve in particular and on race, racism, and biological determinism in general. And yet the idea of innate limits - of biology as destiny - dies hard, as witness the attention devoted to The Bell Curve, whose arguments are here so effectively anticipated and thoroughly undermined by Stephen Jay Gould. Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002) was the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology and Professor of Geology at Harvard University and the author of over twenty books. When published in 1981, The Mismeasure of Man was immediately hailed as a masterwork, the ringing answer to those who would classify people, rank them according to their supposed genetic gifts and limits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |